LIVE BLOG: Talk on Rape Culture in the US Military

I am at the 7:00 presentation on “Confronting the US Military’s Rape Culture” in Kohlberg 116 and the speaker, KP Smith, is about to be introduced by Leah Gallant ’14, the organizer of the event. The vast majority of the audience is female.

 

7:05 KP Smith introduces his talk by drawing a parallel between the conversations that have been going on about rape culture on college campuses and in the military. A recent Department of Defense (DoD) report said 26,000 service members reported being sexually assaulted in the previous year. So the military has tried to respond with hotlines and workshops and counseling services, but the number of cases of reported sexual violence increased by 37% in the past year. The person put in charge of managing the sexual assault was himself accused of sexual assault in the past so this system obviously has glaring issues.

7:08 Sexual assault has been a widespread problem in prisons set up by the US in Iraq and Afghanistan, so prevalent that between the time of the beginning of the War in Iraq and 2004, there were 400 photographically documented incidents of abuse, which is a small percentage of the total number of rapes that occur.

7:11 In Abu Graib, a well-known prison in Iraq, a photo became public of a group of US soldiers torturing a hooded prisoner and started off more rigorous investigation of sexual assault in the military. It is actually increasingly easy to find evidence in their investigations as it is becoming more widespread for soldiers to pose next to the prisoners they are raping or torturing.

7:15 Smith moves to frame the discussion of this issue geographically, as he now a graduate student studying geography. His Google map shows US bases in the Pacific, and a lot of US military power is centered in Japan, especially on Okinawa, where 18% of the landmass of the island is owned by the US DoD.

7:18 Japan and many other countries with a US military presence have prohibited US troops from coming to bars, because of their widespread sexual assault of women. Rape cases in Japan especially are underreported compared to the US (where there is already widespread underreporting) because it is more of a taboo in these areas to admit to being raped.

7:21 Japan historically had a forced prostitution system of sexual slavery where they exploited “comfort women” justified by this alleged irresistible sexual desire on the part of soldiers that will channel itself through rape if it is not institutionalized, a similar logic now being employed in these Pacific US military bases.

7:24 The Recreation Amusement Association was the post-World War II US parallel to the comfort women system, in which more than 20,000 Japanese women were sold into brothels for the service of US servicemen. The logic that this would somehow undermine rape failed drastically, and in fact caused rape incidents to rise. Days before these brothels opened, there were 2 incidents in which US soldiers broke into these brothels and raped thousands of women.

7:27 In the Philippines in the late 1980s, right before the US bases were closed in the early 1990s, prostitution was institutionalized so that women had to be documented, registered, and examined by US doctors to be a prostitute for that US military base. Other countries have “status of force agreements” with the US DoD that makes it impossible for those countries to prosecute US servicemen for sexual crimes. In other words, this violence goes unpunished because the US government protects these servicemen.

7:30 Fast forward to the current situation. US foreign affairs is undergoing a “pivot towards Asia” and subsequently is surrounding China with military bases, increasing the issue of sexual assault there on the part of the US servicemen. The hopeful aspect is the fact that there are a growing number of focus groups in the region moving to confront sexual violence and assault. There was a well-known rape that occurred outside of Tokyo that went essentially unpunished because Japan did not want to upset relations with the US. This incident sparked protests across Japan and drew more attention to this issue.

7:34 Q&A session begins. One audience member asked how we can support this cause from the US. Another asks how to make this issue appeal to students on college campuses and draw more overt parallels between the issues we’re talking about here at Swarthmore and the issues of assault in other places in the world.

7:39 Smith answers that we should work to re-establish the protest as a not only acceptable, but also necessary form of political expression. We can gain so much just by following mass movements elsewhere that are doing things that we should be doing here. Progress will look like really basic conversation about things like the US military presence outside places like Iraq and Afghanistan.

7:42 Smith: It matters to be in a place that has a strong movement that confronts it, like Okinawa and Tokyo because the stigma against people who survive sexual violence on the part of US troops is strong.

7:48 One audience member asked whether there is a way to have an ethical, legal system of sex work or prostitution without victimizing and exploiting women. Another audience member replies that in Bogota, there is a “zone of tolerance” where prostitution is legal and not nearly so exploitative as in other systems in other countries.

7:52 Smith agrees that sex work should be decriminalized because criminalization, as is the case with most prohibitions, exacerbates the problem and there will be a problem a) as long as sex is a commodity, and b) as long as women are oppressed. He also posits that there will always be a power dynamic that cannot be overcome as long as the US occupies such a large percentage of places like Okinawa. The power dynamic of US dominance can only be overcome if the US lessens their presence in these areas.

7:56 The event ends, but the participants move to the Women’s Resource Center to continue the conversation.


Did you like this article? Consider joining the DG! Open staff meetings are every Monday at 6:30 p.m. in Kohlberg; or email us at editors@daily.swarthmore.edu.

4 comments

  1. 0
    SwatGreek says:

    This is the essence of Swarthmore. The campus tries to shape the U.S. military as well as foreign policy into a monster. We demonize the military and the efforts of those overseas who are fighting for our freedom. We had a workshop about Rape Culture in the U.S. Military less than two weeks from Veterans Day. How about having a workshop to thank the members of the military who lose their lives so we can have the option of attending an institution where we can think and speak freely? If the campus culture reflects what the future generations of the U.S. will be like, I am very sorry
    Freedom is not free. Don’t take it for granted.

    1. 0
      Amused Alum '13 says:

      Unless you’re actually denying that the U.S. military has a rape culture issue – in which case, you’re beyond reason and not really worth talking to – you’re literally saying that people should ignore said issue because the military also does good things.

      You’re not even saying that – you’re just saying we should ignore it BECAUSE MILITARY. Choosing to be a member of a particular institution, regardless of the inherent risks that come with it, doesn’t mean you’re given an automatic pass on any kind of institutional criticism. All your rhetoric about losing lives and fighting for freedom doesn’t change the fact that this problem exists.

      If your attitude reflects what future generations of the U.S. will be like, I am afraid for the safety of any woman who makes the same choice to enlist and defend her country, as men feel so free to do. You’re right, freedom isn’t free. There are so many risks associated with being a soldier in the first place – why do you think that being raped without consequence by your own brothers and sisters in arms should be added to the job description?

      1. 0
        SwatGreek says:

        First of all, I am in no way, shape, or form justifying the rape culture of the military. I support your argument that the U.S. Military needs to operate on higher moral standards and fix its institutional problems that lead to these heinous war crimes.
        My argument is that this campus has a tendency of criticizing but not giving credit where credit is due. Read carefully and see how Smith shifted the tone during Q&A from actual rape culture and how we can fix it WITHIN the military to basically inciting students to join demilitarization protests.
        I have no problem with addressing (and hopefully eliminating) rape culture within the military (and anywhere else). My problem lies with how polarized this campus is. On one hand we have a speaker who is proposing protests in favor of demilitarization of U.S. bases in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Okinawa even though these bases serve as strategic barriers against countries like Iran and North Korea. These have threatened the U.S. not too long ago. We never get to hear about the other side though. How come we didn’t have a speaker on Veterans Day to talk about the dangers of PTSD and the hardships that our men and women face in reintroducing themselves as everyday members of society? How come we didn’t have an event to commemorate the troops that liberated Europe from the grip of Nazi Germany or helped out South Korea from being swallowed by the northern regime? I need not remind you that this is the same campus that criticized Robert Zoellick for being part of the Bush administration and supporting the Iraq war to the point that he withdrew.
        Anyway, I’m not trying to justify the rape and unnecessary, degrading torture that the U.S. has committed. All I’m saying is that we really should see a broader spectrum of events and points of view rather the only one that is broadcasted on campus as of now.

  2. 0
    Away says:

    I really appreciate this Live Blog! Great for those of us studying abroad and missing out on some great events, especially those that broaden the discussion on issues Swarthmore began to address during my time away.

Leave a Reply to Amused Alum '13 Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *