StuCo Report: Spirit Week, Student Senate, Committees, Alumni Relations

Spirit Week

StuCo members are working on a proposed series of events tentatively called “Spirit Week,” which will be held once it gets warmer. Like its high-school counterpart, it will include inter-class competitions, events organized by various student groups, and student-suggested theme days – though pajama week was rejected for fear it might taint StuCo’s “street cred.”

Spirit Week comes as a response to widespread concerns over a lack of community and dialog, as well as a perceived absence of class pride. Trivia and other competitions could be held where each class would be represented, each team donning its class’s colors.

The week will be used to promote student groups’ communication with StuCo and each other. The recent Halloween party was cited as a sign that such communication has been lacking. The involvement of student groups in Spirit Week will also make it more community-driven as opposed to StuCo-imposed.

As for funding, StuCo plans to apply for funds from the $150,000 Community Development Fund, with members noting that it will require much less than $10,000.

 

Liaison Task Force/Student Senate

Student Groups Advisor David Ding ’16 came to Sunday’s meeting with a specific proposal: to create a Liaison Task Force. The task force, an idea he co-authored with Dean Liliana Rodriguez, would be a “student-informed panel” that serves to forge new “avenues for communications.”

StuCo showed little enthusiasm for another committee/task force. StuCo members pointed out that the campus community is going through “community fatigue,” exemplified by the small number of applicants for the Title IX Coordinator Search Committee.

Members stressed that rather than creating new committees and groups to deal with similar problems, the College should be looking into eliminating groups that are obsolete.

It was suggested that the Liaison Task Force concept be incorporated into the Student Senate. StuCo members feel that the Senate will draw more student interest and shares many goals with the Liaison Task Force.

Citing the previous semester’s high interest in Student Senate elections, Lanie Schlessinger ’15 said she has faith that the Student Senate will succeed in facilitating communication within the community.

 

Committees

StuCo has noticed that students want change, yet there is little interest in traditional, committee-driven efforts to achieve it. Members pointed out that there is widespread disillusionment with committees. They require large time commitments, yet are unsatisfying to student members because they are confidential and achieve little tangible change.

Some members pointed out that because committees are confidential, they do little to promote transparency. StuCo decided to push committees to make clear what is and is not confidential, so that the community can know as much as possible about their workings.

It was also noted that while many students actively call for change, they are more interested in responding to specific developments rather than overarching problems. StuCo believes that short-term problems should be dealt with through temporary task forces, while long-term committees should be kept to a minimum.

By cutting down on the number of committees, the college will increase the number of applicants for each. As one StuCo member pointed out, there is only a finite amount of politically active Swatties.

One StuCo member even suggested that all committees be merged into the Student Senate. It was decided that this is possible for student-only committees, and should be looked into.

 

Alumni Relations

StuCo members said that Career Services employees feel pressured by negative feedback that they have been receiving. StuCo will meet with Career Services to discuss, among other things, how alumni could be involved in Career Services events.

StuCo wants to get student ideas on what events they would benefit from when alumni visit next March. Mocktail hours and other mixers have been helpful in the past. Others suggested that larger, informal events be emphasized over formal networking dinners.

Members stressed the importance of keeping alumni interested in the school. One member cited the alarming statistic that alumni who do not donate within two years of graduation are likely to never donate at all. It was agreed that the College should increase its efforts to solicit donations – even small amounts – from young alumni. Colgate University, where Rebecca Chopp previously served as President will be contacted to share their experience with effective alumni networking.

 

Party Policies

StuCo pushed discussion of the new party policies to an external meeting.


Hello, did you like this article? Write for The Gazette! Open staff meetings are every Monday at 7:30 p.m. in The Daily Gazette office on Parrish 4th; You can also email us at editors@daily.swarthmore.edu.

Eduard Saakashvili

Eduard is a film and media studies major from Tbilisi, Georgia. He abandoned The Daily Gazette during sophomore year to focus on his career in club fencing. Big mistake.

2 comments

  1. 0
    Juan Gelpi '84 says:

    Speaking as a member of the Alumni Council, I can tell you that there is real interest in the alumni community in establishing contact with current students. Traditionally, students have thought of us as a resource for externships, or career counseling. Keep in mind that we were all Swat students before we were alumni. Many of us fought the battles of divestment, homophobia, sexual assault, war resistence, etc long ago. We would love to listen to current students, hear what matters to you, and, if desired, offer our own perspectives.

  2. 0
    Marian '14 says:

    Just some points I’d love to clarify, that I think might be a little unclear in this article:

    -There are a variety of committee structures here at Swat. Some are student-only (e.g. Movie Committee) while others are a blend of faculty, administrators, and students (e.g. Council for Educational Policy.)

    -Along with that variety of committee structures, there are a variety of policies surrounding confidentiality. Some committees are completely non-confidential, some have elements that are confidential and elements that are not, and others are wholly confidential. (The RA selection committee, for instance, has a blend of transparent and confidential activity. The RA selection discussions are kept confidential, but the agenda for this committee is not confidential, in part because it’s so self-explanatory.) Some committee members are able to report on the actions of their committees, while others are expressly forbidden to even speak about what their committee’s agendas are.

    StuCo really welcomes student input about the committee process, as well as proposals for reforming either student committees or committees as a whole.

    Thanks for your reporting, DG!
    Best,
    Mar Firke ’14
    Representative for Educational Policy

Leave a Reply to Marian '14 Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *