A Militant Crab: IN NOMINE PATERNO

Honestly, the only way I can think to start off this column is by warning y’all: I’m about to piss all over a fresh grave. The dirt, the tombstone, the mourners’ flowers, any stuffed footballs weepy Nittany fans left, the lit candles, the tiny wooden crosses.

pssssssssssss

Penn State’s sex abuse scandal has been strangling the news for the past three months. To recap briefly, Jerry Sandusky — s00per awsum defensive coach for the Nittany Lions — was arrested and charged with over 50 counts of sexual abuse committed over a 15-year period. A temporary janitor and a graduate assistant reported witnessing Sandusky sexually assaulting two different boys in a Penn State football facility. Joe Paterno and other supervisors heard about these incidents in 2000 and 2002, but the inquiry only went public in early November of last year, leading to a tremendous shitstorm in the press and on Penn State’s campuses. Sandusky, Paterno, the head of Penn State’s public safety, the athletics director, the college’s president — all fired. Mid-season! Thunder, lightening, screams, riots, the wailing and gnashing of teeth, etc., followed.

Then, Paterno died.

The media’s eulogies coverage of his death more closely resembles Thanksgiving’s mauve gelatin; if you poke an article or a somber clip, it wobbles perilously back and forth, all while its component parts are totally unidentifiable and vaguely nausea-inducing. Take this editorial. After the author nails the proper response to this latest calamity– good fucking riddance — he changes his tone:

“Others have more compassion in their words.”

(“Others,” here, loosely translates to “apologists for child molestation.”)

pssssssss psss pss ps

Have a little more compassion. For Paterno. Because, after all, he was a football coach. He contributed so much to solving pressing international and domestic issues, such as the devastating hostilities between football and soccer as well as football players’ low graduation rates. He certainly didn’t lead an easy life, surrounded by rabidly adoring fans and piles of money. And, you know besides the whole Sandusky affair — he was a good guy. Devout Catholic! And the winningest football coach. Which matters. A lot.

Athletics culture in action, folks.

Okay, let’s try this. Let’s say we aren’t going to generate all that compassion for Paterno. In fact, let’s take that enormous excess of misguided compassion and INSTEAD have a little more compassion for survivors of childhood sexual assault.

I know this whole hypothetical is ridiculous. It’s not as if these survivors have any serious long-term mental AND physical health effects connected to their trauma. And it’s not like there’s any social stigma (survivors aren’t considered “broken” or “damaged goods”). If those things were real, well shit, wouldn’t we feel guilty about ignoring those people? Maybe not — sometimes, after all, they turn to substances and self-harm to cope with their trauma. Smirky moralizing about “addicts” and “attention whores” becomes considerably more difficult if we realize that

when debilitating psychosomatic pain or depression make it kinda hard to hold down jobs or keep up grades,

when these survivors swallow down shame and blame and guilt and self-loathing until it twists their throats shut, until they barricade themselves in silence and away from other people,

because that’s the best they can do,

THEN, the burden of compassion is really on us, to respect the ways survivors survive — or don’t. Suicide is always selfish, whereas you can get fired in the proceedings of an alleged child abuse case and still be a hero, especially if you’re an old white guy.

Think of everything else that would have to go! What about my faith in authority? It’s easier to just say they are crazy, which is a big word that I really don’t want to unpack, ever. Clearly, all victims DO process their trauma like on Lifetime, so I don’t need to question how stereotyping an entire group of people could be dehumanizing. Also, sports are really important. Really. Important. So is money!

pllp pllpp zzzzzzp

Other than daydreaming of defacing (defecating?) a tomb stone, I’m not fixating on Paterno and his legacy.

My thoughts dwell on the silent children and invisible grown-ups. I mourn for any survivors on Penn State’s campus, while riots and vitriol rage in defense of a violence that touched them personally. I am awed by the courage of the adults and youth who relived their pain in front of a grand jury.

This column is for those, any survivors.


Did you like this article? Consider joining the DG! Open staff meetings are every Monday at 6:30 p.m. in Kohlberg; or email us at editors@daily.swarthmore.edu.

0 comments

  1. 0
    William says:

    Cult of Personality perpetuating unchecked. Makes me wonder what has hurt the perception of PSU more: the Scandal or the Reaction by the fanbase?

    Compassion: “…but that never changed who he was.”

    What he turned out to be was a person that when given a choice between protecting children or protecting his precious football program,decided the children should finish second.

  2. 0
    Scorn Larson says:

    Dear Crab,
    Thank you for this. I had a lot of frustration with the whole Paterno canonization process but could not articulate it well.

    Love,
    Scorn

  3. 0
    Compassion says:

    I don’t think compassion has to be mutually exclusive. Joe Paterno failed miserably in his response to the allegations of childhood sexual assault by Jerry Sandusky. But Paterno was more than just a football coach to his players and to the Penn St. community. You’re right – he did live a life surrounded by adoring fans and piles of money – but that never changed who he was. Is that enough to crown him? Maybe not. But compassion isn’t zero-sum.

    A really nice piece by Rick Reilly about the compassion of Joe Paterno.

    http://espn.go.com/espn/story/_/id/7492873/rick-reilly-paterno-true-legacy

    1. 0
      not enough compassion says:

      I’m sure that Joe Paterno was full of compassion – for his family, for his friends, for the members of his team. But he didn’t have enough compassion for those kids. I don’t know- none of us do- the whole story; how much he really knew, what he really thought. But I think that having reason to believe, even having reason to suspect, that someone is being abused and not actively fighting to stop it is cruel, inhumane, and deeply lacking in compassion.

  4. 0
    otherwise agrees says:

    Is formatting crazily like this this a feminist thing? I see it on blogs too. Please explain so I can stop subscribing to the hegemony of good taste

    1. 0
      Sara '12 says:

      I have several issues with this comment, mainly that:

      1) It sets up “feminist” as being equivalent to “crazy” and weird. What’s up with that?

      2) Uh, what? It’s not hard to see how the formatting is supposed to get at how the author feels and depict the flow of their thoughts and frustrations, as a way of expressing that through their style. I’m pretty sure using style and form as a way to express feelings or inform content is not limited to any particular ideology.

    2. 0
      seriously? says:

      someone just wrote an entire article about horrific child abuse and all you can think about is the formatting? fuck your hegemony of good taste.

      and abuse is not just a feminist issue.

      1. 0
        the importance of being coherent ( User Karma: 0 ) says:

        Regardless of content or subject, I think it is absolutely fair and pertinent to judge the effectiveness of an argument and the way something is written. This piece is a small improvement to what was militant crab’s rambling, incoherent, and ineffectual first piece.

        It’s fine to take artistic license, but that is not a method for amateurs.

        I’m only harsh because what is a very important topic to address, and what makes for a very interesting perspective, is being diluted by the gushing sound of your piss.

        Also, it’d be nice if we stopped thinking that talking about Joe Paterno is something radical, or that agreeing with 90% of the voices at this school is attune to saying something significant. It’s shocking that Paterno or Michael Jackson are remembered as stars first, molesters second. The fact you agree is not as shocking.

        1. 0
          Still Upset says:

          Just a note, but Paterno is NOT a molester. That’s Sandusky. What Paterno did is morally reprehensible and not redeemable by any standards, but lumping him in with people who actually committed the crime is going to far. It’s important to keep the truth in focus even when voicing outrage.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *