The Swarthmore Food Cooperative

McCabe Has a Gender-Neutral Bathroom?

The signThis sign? Now out of date.

The answer, in short: As of August, yes!

The second floor men's bathroom was converted into a single-occupancy space in order to fit two different needs; the College was already in the process of creating restrooms that would meet standards set by the Americans with Disabilities Act when the College expanded their non-discrimination statement to include gender identity and expression (The Gazette reported the change here).

As part of that process, says Equal Opportunity Officer Sharmaine LaMar, the Equal Opportunity Advisory Commission recommended "that the College provide at least one gender neutral, single-occupancy restroom in each major building on campus." As a result, "the committee collaborated with Facilities staff to find the right bathroom in McCabe that would meet both goals."

Director of Facilities Stu Hain explained that in order to accomodate disabilities, "we reduced the number of toilet fixtures to allow a wheel chair to maneuver, eliminated a door for the same reason and made the room lockable for privacy."

He continued, "Because that created a space that was suitable for one person at a time to use, including the lock on the entrance door, it made sense to us that it could be used as a 'safe' bathroom as well. We just changed the sign to indicate it may be used by either sex, and we will do the same wherever possible."

Are there other changes you like (or don't) around campus? We'll find out the answers for you--just let us know at dailygazette [at] swarthmore [dot] edu.

Share:

Print    Email

Swat Contracts with Security Firm AlliedBarton

At the beginning of this semester, two new security guards began patrolling campus during the 9:00pm to 3:30am shift. These guards are employed by AlliedBarton, a security firm that was contracted by the college to provide additional nighttime security; however, their presence has also led students to examine AlliedBarton’s disputed labor policies.

#1: 11/16/2007 at 10:23 a.m.

  • U
  • D
  • (+3)

But why the men's room?! Specifically, why change the mens but not the womens?


— J | Unregistered, Swarthmore

#2: 11/16/2007 at 11:01 a.m.

  • U
  • D
  • (+6)

According to Sharmaine LaMar, the men's room on the second floor "came closest to already being a single-occupancy restroom" out of all the restrooms in McCabe.

My hypothesis is that even if that weren't the case, the fact that women spend longer in the bathroom would seem to suggest that it's usually a better idea to convert men's to gender-neutral rather than women's.


Lauren Stokes | Staff

#3: 11/17/2007 at 11:18 p.m.

  • U
  • D
  • (+3)

What's more puzzleing is why they decided to designate the handicap bathroom on the second floor. If I were handicapped, I would probably study on the first floor so I wouldn't have to, you know, walk up a flight of stairs.


— b | Unregistered, Swarthmore

#4: 11/18/2007 at 1:45 p.m.

  • U
  • D
  • (+3)

There is an elevator in McCabe, so walking up stairs is not an issue.
Not really all that puzzling.


— R | Unregistered, Swarthmore

#5: 11/18/2007 at 2:18 p.m.

  • U
  • D
  • (+5)

Also, no bathroom on the first floor!


Lauren Stokes | Staff

Submit a Comment

: Log in to verify your identity.
: Required, but will not be made public.

Comments posted anonymously must be approved by Gazette staff before they are published.


Discussion Rules

  • Be nice.
  • Be constructive.
  • Don't curse.
  • Don't threaten.

More details on our policies here.


Register an Account | Login